Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
| en:hy:relevance [2013/08/25 16:07] – [From which relevance level should I give increased attention to a player?] mixalagala | en:hy:relevance [2017/11/07 12:40] – [From which relevance level should I give increased attention to a player?] A-007 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| * ... the **current** and **potential skills** known from Hattrick as well as the skill information solely known in HY (from **twins**, **rejected players**, **current skill estimations**) to calculate the relevance. | * ... the **current** and **potential skills** known from Hattrick as well as the skill information solely known in HY (from **twins**, **rejected players**, **current skill estimations**) to calculate the relevance. | ||
| * ... the **stars ratings** that your player got, for the different positions, to roughly estimate the current and potential skill levels for your player. | * ... the **stars ratings** that your player got, for the different positions, to roughly estimate the current and potential skill levels for your player. | ||
| - | * ... the **speciality** to determine if your player is an outfield player or keeper (keepers do not have a specialty in youth academies). | + | * ... the **speciality** to determine if your player is an outfield player or keeper (keepers do not have a specialty in youth academies). Additionally the relevance increases if the player' |
| * ... the known **top3-skills** to calculate and limit the cap for unknown skills and detect if the player is an outfield player or keeper. | * ... the known **top3-skills** to calculate and limit the cap for unknown skills and detect if the player is an outfield player or keeper. | ||
| * ... the **all-rounder skill** and the known top3-skills to determine the potentials of the remaining top3-skills. | * ... the **all-rounder skill** and the known top3-skills to determine the potentials of the remaining top3-skills. | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
| Based on this information we calculate the minimum and maximum relevance and display them as the relevance range. | Based on this information we calculate the minimum and maximum relevance and display them as the relevance range. | ||
| - | xxxxx | + | The formula can be found here (written in PHP): https:// |
| - | x | + | |
| ===== From which relevance level should I give increased attention to a player? ===== | ===== From which relevance level should I give increased attention to a player? ===== | ||
| Line 36: | Line 35: | ||
| After a decent amount of time, when you have revealed several bits of information about your players and the minimum and maximum relevance have got closer together, it is rather simple to identify who is of great interest and who is not. | After a decent amount of time, when you have revealed several bits of information about your players and the minimum and maximum relevance have got closer together, it is rather simple to identify who is of great interest and who is not. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Danish | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hvilket relevansniveau skal jeg give mere opmærksomhed til en spiller? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Der er ikke noget generelt svar på dette spørgsmål. Især da det er vigtigt at skelne mellem mindste og maksimale relevans her. Scouted spillere har en meget høj maksimal relevans og en meget lav minimumsrelevans i starten, fordi kun en lille mængde information er tilgængelig. Som basis er at jo tættere den mindste relevans er for den maksimale relevans, jo højere er relevansen af betydning. Så du bør prøve (som altid) at afsløre så meget information som muligt om din spiller ved at markere ham, når det er muligt. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Efter en anstændig tid, når du har afsløret flere oplysninger om dine spillere, og den minimale og maksimale relevans er kommet tættere på hinanden, er det ret nemt at identificere, | ||
| ===== What is not considered and/or what else should I do know? ===== | ===== What is not considered and/or what else should I do know? ===== | ||
| Line 41: | Line 48: | ||
| It is impossible for us to consider all possible aspects in our calculation and thus we have to make some approximations, | It is impossible for us to consider all possible aspects in our calculation and thus we have to make some approximations, | ||
| - | In general our calculation favors Multi-Skillers. For instance, a player who can get inadequate in two skills, can have a higher relevance than a player who can get solid in one skill and have pretty poor remaining skills. Such Mono-Skillers may get a lower relevance rating, just as some users would rate them personally. Please keep that in mind. | + | In general our calculation |
| + | \\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | <note tip>For the Manual click [[manual|here]]!</ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Danish | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hvad overvejes ikke og / eller hvad skal jeg vide mere? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Det er umuligt for os at overveje alle mulige aspekter i vores beregning, og derfor skal vi lave nogle tilnærmelser, | ||
| + | Generelt foretrækker vores beregningsmetode Multi-Skillers. For eksempel kan en spiller, der kan blive utilstrækkelig i to færdigheder, | ||